This article was about a man that stabbed one his friends for eating the last piece of chicken it makes me think that the news just gathered the little information and wrote about it. They weren't very thoughtful as to who reported it but just said "the Police said" and not who the actual person was who thought that. Were they a detective, or maybe it was a police officers first day on the job and that's just what he assumed about the scene. The guy might of stabbed his friend because he had anger management or maybe he was having a mental breakdown and became violent. The news doesn't tell us that maybe something was going on with the guy, just that he did something horrible. The audience now will view him as a bad guy, when in reality we don't know the full story, just the short version of it. There is always two sides to a story and more information that we will know. The news just gives us the gist of the story, so we don't have time to think about our opinion we are just agreeing with what is being said. Because it is a news cite people will believe it, but we don't really know what type of police officers were on the scene. We also don't know what kind of people were involved with the crime, we know nothing about them, just what the news says. The credibility cant be reliable because we don't know who the reporter is and if we can trust them. Below I will put a link of the article if you wish to check it out.
http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/news/2015/11/04/texas-man-stabbed-to-death-by-friend-after-taking-last-piece-chicken-police-say/?intcmp=hplnws
I've seen this around before and I really like that you chose this topic for this entry. One of the things I find as a huge red flag is all the "allegedly"'s in the article, to me meaning "didn't really happen".
ReplyDeleteits all media and ratings that all i ever see it they want that new person looking at their stories
ReplyDelete